Israel follows Hezbollah.. What is the truth about its attitude towards the events in Syria?

At the same time, attention is drawn to… Syria Where received Israel Blame it Hezbollah In exploiting the situation there to strengthen its regional influence.

“Today’s fileHe discussed with the guests the scale of these tensions, as well as possible scenarios for the collapse or continuation of the truce.

Mutual violations… Israel’s threats and Hezbollah’s responses

The program reviewed the mutual violations witnessed in recent days, including Israeli raids Which targeted the town of Betley in South Lebanonwhich led to death.

Journalist Savsan Muhanna confirmed that the agreement signed between Hezbollah and Israel contains ambiguous provisions, which leaves room for multiple interpretations that lead to continuous violations by both sides.

Israel and freedom of military action

A lecturer at the Academy of the West Galilee, Moshe Elad, spoke of Israel’s policy of “freedom of military action”, as Tel Aviv felt the agreement did not prevent it from targeting Hezbollah inside Lebanon or Syria.

Elad indicated that Israel views any attempt to transfer weapons to Syria or rearm as a direct violation of the agreement, giving it justification for continuing the airstrikes.

The role of the five-year committee in the implementation of the agreement

The discussion focused on the role of the five-member committee, which includes representatives of the Lebanese and Israeli armies, along with forces from the United States, France and UNIFIL, in monitoring the implementation of the ceasefire agreement.

Muhana pointed out that this board is facing big challenges, especially the lack of clarity about the mechanism for solving violations, stressing that the board can be a decisive element in calming the situation if its role is seriously activated.

Hezbollah and the agreement… between implementation and challenge

Muhana confirmed that it is difficult for Hezbollah to fully implement the agreement, especially with regard to the withdrawal of weapons from southern Litani, as these weapons are considered part of its defense strategy.

She added that the party faces internal and regional pressures that may affect its future decisions, but repeated Israeli violations force it to act to ensure the balance of deterrence is maintained.

The position of the Lebanese government

The episode discussed the Lebanese government’s position on the escalation, as Mouhana stressed that the government is in a difficult situation between preserving Lebanon’s sovereignty and ensuring that the agreement does not collapse.

She noted that the government relies on the five-year-old committee to ease tensions, but faces major challenges in dealing with Israeli pressure and international demands.

Future scenarios

Elad concluded the discussion by presenting his vision for the future of the agreement, noting that both sides have an interest in continued calm, but rising tensions could lead to escalation if violations are not checked.

For her part, Muhana stressed that the agreement could last if it is implemented with a clear mechanism, with the need to make concessions on both sides to ensure its continuity.

In light of the continued escalation and mutual violations, the future of the ceasefire between Hezbollah and Israel remains dependent on the balance between regional and international interests.

Will the parties manage to avoid an open confrontation or will the agreement witness a collapse that will return the region to the cycle of conflict?